Refactoring is a discipline in the development of a software product involving restructuring of code, altering its internal structure without modifying its external or observable behavior.
As the development team crafts the software from the beginning of the sprint with the goal of a shippable increment, the code is not fine-tuned for perfection or efficiency, including neglecting nonfunctional requirements. As the sprint progresses, more code gets added to the existing code base, making it fragile.
There are a number of possible reasons behind the bad code:
The Boy Scouts have a rule: “Leave the campground cleaner than you found it.” You should apply the same principle to your code. Merciless refactoring prevents code rot by keeping the code base clean and easy to maintain.
The test-driven development methodology pictured below—popularly called the red, green, refactor cycle—focuses on regular refactoring as the design evolves during the course of the development.
The development team should educate the product owner on how refactoring can make life easier. The team can spend a relatively small amount of time—maybe 10 percent—on refactoring bad code from sprint to sprint, leading to better code stability. Refactoring activities can be added to the product backlog as user stories based on mutual agreements, so they can be picked up for sprint planning successively.
There may be prioritization challenges between new features and refactoring, and the team must understand that a system that is robust can extend more features—not an unstable one.
Pair programming and code review techniques promoted by Extreme Programming can help developers write cleaner code the first time. These practices point out to programmers where they can remove too many nested loops, get rid of complicated conditional statements, and improve modularity of the code by reducing the number of lines. Automated tests provide feedback quickly on the refactored code, whether or not we’ve changed the behavior of the system. Developers having a clear understanding of the definition of done can help in removing bad code as well.
Refactoring should not be a Sisyphean effort; it just needs a lot of patience and discipline from the team. Just like how the code is built line by line, module by module, refactoring should also be focused on unplugging bad lines of code by removing bad variables, bad classes, or bad methods one at a time.
If the team is able to implement a rigorous process within the sprint to eliminate bad code, or to negotiate with the product owner to have user stories added to the backlog for refactoring, it can help to pay down the principle of technical debt.
Dheerendra is a project management consultant for Simplilearn. He is involved in the structuring of the project management course. He values curious minds and scrambles to learn new things.
Nice article, thanks for sharing informative or useful content.
Thankyou for sharing the information. Website is so easy to use – I am impressed with it.
Nice article. This has a lot of information. Thank you. Also learn about python course and other courses to gain more knowledge and build your career.
Nice Article. Very informative.
NIce content. So much convincing.
Thanks for Very useful article.
Great information thanks for sharing.
Nice article, thanks for sharing informative post.
Website is so easy to use – I am impressed with it. Thank you for Sharing.
When building SaaS products, security becomes a top priority, and ensures the safety of your web product. There are lots of precautions to protect the data within this framework, including usage of numerous gems for authentication and increasing password length, multiple built-in encryption libraries, skipping forgery requests, and strong parameters usage.
hi,
Excellent Blog! I would like to thank for the efforts you have made in writing this post.